Recent content by 13pm

Now that there are dragons in Fallout, I wonder when Bethesda will finally merge it with TES. Some magic in Fallout would be nice, right? That fits so well.

http://www.polygon.com/2016/9/28/13081728/wasteland-3-announcement-fig-kickstarter-crowdfunding-release-date My heart nearly stopped before I understood what he really meant.

I don't actually think they've cut out the content for DLCs. Those are pretty much standalone stories. However, I'm definitely sure the content was cut out. Sterling's idea of the game being divided into two part sounds very credible. Espeically after playing the game and rewatching the launch...

Just noticed another funny thing about this announcement. Obviously, "more than $60 worth of content" is marketing bullshit, but that's even more to that. Let's do some quick calculations. Today they've announced DLC priced 9.99, 4.99 and 24.99, which makes a total of roughly $40. 60-40=20...

>Fart Harbor Sorry, couldn't resist. Hordes of evil robots, taxidermy and dungeons. That just screams 'Fallout', yeah.

Bethesda has announced 3 DLC packs for Fallout 4. Only one of them seems to involve some kind of a story, other two simply add new items and creatures. As described on Bethesda's website: Automatron, $9.99 The mysterious Mechanist has unleashed a horde of evil robots into the Commonwealth...

This game is pretty much the same league as The Stanley Parable for me — it relies heavily on the medium to tell the story. I find this kind of games quite amusing and enjoyable. While I absolutely hated the "avoid the white objects" mechanics, it was justified by the core idea that sparing the...

I loved TW1 when it came out. It was full of flaws (ah, those swamps), but the atmosphere, the world were amazing. The quests were nice too. TW2 was a huge disappointment for me: it looked and worked as a console port, which mainly ruined it for me. The quests were mostly meh. Also, CDPR took...

As if it would help this game.

A friend of mine, who is not that much into Fallout, but adores Skyrim (still being a good guy tho') is just calling them Orcs. Which they are. Just look at the titles: Ancient Behemoth, Epic Behemoth, Supermutant Warlord, Overlord. As @Gaddes said, they are just there, for no reason. Along...

That was one of my biggest issues with Bethesdian Fallouts since Fallout 3. While some things look just gorgeous (e.g. protectrons, flying bots etc), the majority of objects, clothes and creatures are just generic. Fallouts 1&2 were consistent in style. Bethesda's Fallouts are not. And it's not...

That gave me a good laugh, thanks!

These are some really great logical conclusions. I get a feeling that you either haven't read my post or argue just for the sake of arguing.

<dude> As is giving 10, yet there's a huge amount of such scores. That's a way of expressing opinions. Those extremes counterbalance each other. Look at any game on Metacritic, there are always people who give a game zeros, but in the end, the average score is more or less representative...

I know that pre-release copies sent to reviewers were mostly for XBox. I've thought of that as a possible explanation, but it explains only the higher critics score, not the players. Sure, no-one who has played the game could write anything negative about this masterpiece.