So as long I don't experience it myself I have no right to criticize that aspect of the game even if the developer himself tells me of it's lousy game design a.k.a all companions can be romanced regardless of your gender thus making them with no/any sexual identity?
Oh please, let's just be honest. Everyone's gonna try to romance just for the sake of seeing how it works and how Bethesda did it. Using the excuse that it's optional is just bullshit. It's like getting a new car with new features and not at least trying them because the maker says you don't...
Well the Join the BoS Achievement kinda confirms that the BoS in Fallout 4 will from the midwest. Now I wonder we'll see the power armor from Fallout Tactics.
You can go anywhere an spout that shit, because that's an obvious assumption. Go to a [insert games name] forum and say people there are gonna either buy or pirate that game. See any difference from NMA?
Sure. That's hardly ripping off. We can agree with that, but there's nothing bold in that tweet, even if it angered Beth drones. It easy (too easy if you ask me) to rile them up.
Call it whatever you want, but that's an obvious troll tweet. Bethesda ripping of Mass Effect? And what did they rip off? Romancing? This kind of thing existed before Mass Effect? Baldurs Gate 2 and Planescape Torment had romancing and that was way before even Bioware was bought by EA. Other...