Search results

Animation ain't cheap either. Big shows like The Simpsons and Familiy Guy have very high production costs, both in money and labour investments, and they pull in ratings to support those costs. Any property for Fallout in film or television would need the bigger audience Bethesda pulled in by...

Lol what?

Yep

Such happy discussion going around here, I see. Business as usual.

Yes, I can attest to sharing the statement that one does the franchise better, even if I don't believe that Beth's Fallouts are terrible games. The issue was that you did not present the arguement in a fair light, because if we were to take those four sites that gave the good scores to XCOM...

Fair enough, but it's not a complete side-by-side comparison. You've hightlighted the ones who gave XCOM near flawless scores, namely Guardian, Escapist, XGN, IGN Spain; and contrasted it against the mixed reviews for Fallout 4, namely PC World, Riot Pixels and GRYOnline?. Would you have given...

Someone who was being thorough in assembling this collection would surely tell us who is being quoted in these reviews and provide links to the relevant articles. You have not done either, and therefore, even if it is true that XCOM has recieved a better critical consensus than Fallout 4, this...

I don't know man. How can you be sure you are not letting your hatred of Bethesda invent more reasons to feel justfied in loathing them. I don't like it; it's one of the few features that most can agree on, but I wouldn't go saying such things unless I knew for a fact that's how it went down...

So you're in favour of discriminating against and censoring an aspect of the online encyclopedia dedicated to all things Fallout because you don't like it. Or were you just making an offhand comment that I've read too much into?

That's what the D's for!

Oh so witty, we got a bunch of comedians present here.

Perhaps because as individuals they feel they must bring light to its flaws but cannot say that they did not enjoy themselves playing it. In short, they can't say that it's shit because it's their personal opinion that it isn't. Just with some noticable flaws is all.

I think this is going off topic... whatever the original topic was.

Yeah developers don't really do DLCs for each other, especially in this case where there's nothing impeding Bethesda from doing it themselves, and an external company like Obsidian having their own projects on hand.

Oh heaven forbid that someone else of some popularity declare Fallout 4 worthy of a place on a GOTY list. But I pose this query; to any that believes this claim, what do they offer that makes their view worth listening to?

I think someone's reading too much into the story of a Call of Duty campaign, which are hardly the very model of a true reflection of reality.

Yeah I think I agree with maybe 40% of some of the arguments presented here. The rest, I feel is just there for validation's sake, to justify that it really is a hollow experience and to solidify holding the position of being against it.

Another arguement to throw on the pile, eh?

One day, and this day may never come; Bethesda will announce Fallout 5 will have a multiplayer mode and have a bunch of microtransactions with a season pass with a hefty fee. Then they'll announce a movie deal with the intent to make a "shared universe" of Fallout films. Finally, they'll...

Oh to your #11 post. I think I already responded to your original post.