Search results

This argument is completely pointless. You have ignored what I've said...You've said that I haven't been making the argument that I have been making all along. You've asked the same question in 30 different ways when I've given you the same answer over and over again. You either are...

Well, yes I am talking human targets. We don't know what target locations they will have for non humanoids yet. Other than atennae targetting being confirmed in the game for the mutated Ants.

Yes. I explained it. You just keep ignoring it. A "normal" shot to the head CAN'T blind someone. A "critical" hit on the head, hitting the orbital lobe, can blind someone. As I said, I wish you COULD aim there. However, why you can't, is beacause a hit in that location should ALWAYS result in...

How was that a doge at all? I explained it exactly. As for the quote. Here, from Briosafreak's blog http://fallout3.wordpress.com/2007/07/12/massive-e3-fallout-3-post/ These two paragraphs should be answered together. There's no visual difference between a crit and a normal hit, you...

No they didn't say "shooting the head make the head go boom". They said a critical hit on a bullet through the eye will gib the head anyway.. You really don't see the difference? Just think about it for a second. The eye is a soft-tissued opening to your brain. The oribital lobe has bone...

Semantics. They said that scoring a critical hit with a bullet to the eyeball would "gib the whole head". They also said that critical hits to the head would have chances to cause effects of a knock out, or blindness. eyeball is not the same thing as the are of the eye which would include...

From what I understand blinding, and hitting the eye, are in the game. Its just targeting the eye that's out. If you score a critical hit, while targeting the head, you have a chance of hitting the eye and blinding them.

There are only a handfull of commercial RPGs ever made that this isn't true for. Its not a neccessary requirement for a good RPG.

Yeah, well the need to "not be mainstream" is a personality trait that's pretty much identical to the need to fit in. Like what you like. And don't worry if others like it, or don't. It shouldn't lessen your enjoyment of something, if almost everybody else enjoys that thing too, anymore than...

Whatever happened to the "We don't talk about (insert game here) and say it should be turnbased" talk? Bioshock is really that great. And, it certainly doesn't play the same as "every other FPS". If you want to miss out on it because of the "hype" that's really your call. But you will be...

What the hell are you going on about? This has nothing to do with impressions, or minorities, or majorities. There are many Fallout fans that are optimistic about Fallout 3. That's a fact. Not an impression. Any talk about minorities, majorities, casual, or hardcore gamers gets into...

Your response really has nothing to do with what I said. This has nothing to do with impressions. I have flat out seen, "many" different fans that are optimistic about Fallout 3. If its only a matter of looking at this website, then you would get the impression that most people are oppossed...

I would say that many fans are cautiously optimistic, based on what I've seen across all the message boards. The optimistic fans just don't post here.

I'd say everyone's jumping about overboard about this comment. Emil answered it a little poorly, but the real problem with it was the question not the answer. The interviewer was the person who lead the conversation in that direction, by asking an uniformed question about preserving...

The guy who's going to sweep in and save the Fallout style RPG legecy with Wasteland 2?