Search results

About the dialogue wheel: If there's a limit to how many options you have in a dialogue system and if there happens to be an option that the player can't say it's ALWAYS bad. It doesn't matter if the limit is 5 or 3. It's terrible. Period.

Because we have clear proof that the perk system is fucking shite. Most people here can judge stuff on their own. Great. Also the argument is basically "You can't criticize something if you don't like it" which is complete and utter fucking BULLSHIT Get this through your head: People are...

Wow. Not only do the graphics look bad it's like they didn't even put any effort into the environments really.

There's no way he meant that. I really hope that he meant it's not as BAD as CoD.

Welp I pretty much have full confidence as well that this game is gonna be crap or maybe super mediocre with SOME good/funny moments. I don't know why this guy praised the perks so much honestly seeing as how this system does pretty much nothing new at all and just dumbs it down. LostPony...

kostjamoscow: I think what they mean is that the game emphasizes mindlessly shooting things instead of actually thinking about stuff in the game, not that the improvement in the "gameplay" (that is the shooting part) is a bad thing. Call of Duty is pretty much known for mindlessly shooting things.

Settlements are optional they said, dialogue could work they said. When will people learn. :(

So there's a drawback with the weapon modding after all huh? And I thought it was a beacon of hope next to the shit that is the settlements...

Textures look pretty shit in most areas, rest of the stuff looks serviceable-ish.

I used to be a vault dweller like you, but then I took a newspaper to the knee from a rock-it launcher. Someone needs to turn this into a mod. Have every useless NPC say that.

Maybe it's some clever social commentary about real life?

Sure they can accept that they're not human but shouldn't it be made apparent to the player? That's why this twist just seems that much dumber.

How could someone not know they're an android for like 200 years or something? You would figure it out somehow right?

We only have a few days to go so it's not long til we find out if it's shit/medicore/good. Not much point in discussing things over and over now.

I did notice that with the settlements. Something tells me that BGS might be completely oblivious of it outside a gameplay mechanic.

Were there crops in the last shot? Did BGS finally learn that people need to grow food in order to survive?

Pre-release... If Bethesda made a presentation without the countless amount of stupid gimmicks and plain bad systems like the dialogue and perks, then we would be optimistic about it. Like this, we have every reason to be skeptical/pessimistic. On release... If the game turns out to be...

I mean you say you're relaxed and then go on to call someone a shithead. I just don't think this type of "discussion" is very healthy yeah? Also just to stir the pot here I don't know why you have such a huge problem with the missiles not being shown, when the entire battle between Caesar's...

Battlecross just relax. There's no point in calling everyone out each and every time you disagree with them. If I were you I would honestly just leave this place. Not in the sense of "just leave if you don't like it here" because that would be a dumb thing to say to someone but just for the sake...

There has to be SOME way you can objectively compare the two games, right? Something has to exist. Then again it's not really fair to compare FO1/FO2 to FO3/FO4 because they're very different games.