Search results

This is rather my thought. Regardless of the merits (or lack thereof) of the game/developer, it's just too soon for all these people to be jumping on the bandwagon. We haven't even seen the results from Double Fine yet, let alone inXile or whoever is developing that Shadowrun game. I just can't...

Wow, thanks for posting this. Had not heard of this game at all. And it looks amazing.

Normally you can browse the iPhone's pictures just like it's a USB drive. Go to My Computer, find the iPhone (listed as a drive just like any other removable storage drive), open it up, and there ya go........

Where from his post did you get that he was saying turn-based is automatically better? I actually thought he was remarking favorably on the choice to go with real-time combat.

Yep. The adventurers in D1 were just that, adventurers. Not princes, half-demons, or anything like that. In D2, the Rogue and the Sorcerer from D1 ended up corrupted, becoming Raven and whatever-the-mage-in-the-Arcane-Sanctum-was-called. In D3, now alluva sudden the D1 Warrior was the...

Nothing really confusing about it. Diablo 3 is being developed by a team that consists pretty much entirely of people who had zilch to do with Diablo or Diablo 2. And it doesn't help that the team lead is kind of a douche who espouses such golden phrases as "concentrated coolness" as design...

More like devolution...

Looks neat, and it's not being developed by Bethesda, so it has promise in that regard. 'Course, a CG trailer proves nothing. I'll reserve judgement until I see in-game action.

Obviously I was using a bit of hyperbole. But if you have a better idea for doing the localization without spending a ton of money, then by all means spit it out. Uh huh, right. So If they could get awesome localization done for free, their apathy towards it would be so great they wouldn't do it?

While having a good localization team with (practically) unlimited time to translate and 24-hour access to the writing staff for clarification on issues would be ideal, it's not realistic. When you're dealing with publishers, they don't want to spend the money. With Wasteland 2, it seems to me...

What are you talking about? What can't be explained by publisher interference and having to use Bethesda's crap engine?

I'm confused; how do you "volunteer" a Ranger? o_0 Also, I have never played Wasteland and I am extremely interested in seeing a good Let's Play of it, so let's make this happen.

He pledged that before the kickstarter even launched, IIRC. I don't think Brian honestly had any idea if it would even meet the $900,000 goal, let alone sail past it. Update: Ding ding ding! We have officially passed the 3 million mark! :drunk: :clap: :notworthy: :salute: :dance: :aiee...

I'm pretty sure NMA's chip-in was already donated and is part of the either the kickstarter or paypal tallies. Don't quote me on that though. Update: Less than 3.5k to go.

Combined pledges $2,993,442, by my count. Edit Update: Less than 5k to go.

Mkay, maybe I should say, did anyone record the good bits? I'm having trouble finding anything actually going on, and when I do I can't get the damn sound to work.

http://wasteland.inxile-entertainment.com/pledge.php

Combined pledges right now: $2,989,912 Seriously. ~$10,000 to hit the 3 million mark with 3 hours to go. C'mon...

Did anyone record this so those of us who missed it can check it out?

... All that website is is a collection of high-resolution art (and some vector art) from Fallout posted on one page for easy reference. How the hell does that violate any form of copyright/intellectual-property law?