Search results

I think that is where the mistake and the misgivings reside, particularly in the case of Van Buren. It was recognizable as a Fallout game, but it was not just like 'Fallout 1 and 2 without changes or updates'. Whereas there are many things from FO 1 and 2 that I'm sure many of us would be fine...

Well, imagine if FO:POS had been titled FO3. Putting it in the sequence of the numbered games like that would make it much harder to ignore or overwrite in terms of canonical 'lore' and such. Even people who didn't like FO2 can't marginalize it in any practical manner and ignore (or write off as...

Yeah, I wonder. When I was watching an episode of Most Evil, I noticed Arthur Shawcross blinks a lot as well. Could there be a connection?

We already saw 'anything' Fallout. It was titled FO:BOS. I shouldn't have to remind anyone of how that turned out. The desire should only be for good Fallout, not just 'anything' Fallout. I get such a kick out of X-Play when it comes to stuff like this. For all their smarmy, snarky attitude...

I really don't think "that which does not kill me makes me stronger" has much application there, though. No, because Black Isle was wise enough not to stick junk like the magical toilet spring of healing into those games. Of course, that's with the exception of some things that aren't...

I could not agree more. Claiming that as being evolution is like saying a rhino is the evolution of an elephant. Bringing it even closer to the manner that Bethesda seems to be approaching this, removing the trunk and putting a rhino horn on an elephant doesn't really make it a better elephant...

I'd rather it not be bad, but if it's going to be bad, I'd settle for it failing so badly that people just stop even talking about Bethesda in relation to Fallout. That it would be so blocked out and forgotten that the next developers to get the license (Obsidian for 'dream come true' points)...