I wish I could say just hang in there for a few more years, GW will face bankruptcy in a few years because they havent changed their ways in the last decade and will have to start reducing prices.
But they just pulled a shotgun tactic a year ago and gave video game licences of their products...
I agree to this. Mediocre games get higher grades than they should just because of their popularity/publisher/being AAA titles(though Ive seen few exceptions to this). This will also be true for the high scores FO4 will get.
Lowest 80, 8/10, 4/5 at most from popular critics. Any critic who gives something lower will get a lot of heat. But I can see it getting scores like 3/5 or 65/100 from lesser known ones.
I wonder if it will get anything below 8/10 from major websites or magazines that people follow. Or getting something like 60 or 70 by critics on Metacritic. I cant even imagine the meltdown it will cause.
But I think those big websites will just give 8/10 or even 9/10 to avoid all the fuss...
I said I would be fine with it because pure actions game dont do much for me(with few exceptions like Wolfenstein) so I could just ignore it. But when its name is Fallout and when everyone is talking about it, it really annoys me(even on official Diablo 3 forums a guy posted about it on a few...
It would be fine with FO4 getting 10/10s as an action game. But it will get that praise as an RPG game that gives you freedom. Even the thought of it upsets me.
It seems Bethesda fanboys finally lost themselves.
Considered fanatics for criticizing a games obvious flaws let alone the fact that game is the newest title in their favorite series? Get over yourself.
You would laugh and agree when those rest of the fans make fun of older games and even...
They first implemented that with Serana in Skyrim, depending on the place she would use workbenches, cut wood, cooked and used any interactable things around her.
Logic aside every city in Skyrim and Oblivion looked great to me until I spent more than 10 minutes and saw how they are just...