Search results

oh, that's not my point. i have no problem with sexual content in computer games. hell, in fallout 1+2 you could have sex with many people. but it wasn't hyped in any way. this guy sounds like "yes i want a sex scene that i can look forward to", as if it would be a special highlight. think...

somehow, I think these points on his wishlist aren't top priority neither for oblivion nor fo3. he not only misses the essential flaws of oblivion but also asks for features in fo3 that would do nothing for the game. a sex scene. please. rent a porno.

keep in mind that the primary goal of this PR message would be not only to inform about the number of endings (which is quite meaningless, and as we see now, unimpressive) but to demonstrate how fast the game is developing etc. so i'm pretty sure that they never checked the number of endings...

this isn't such a big thing, but it took quite an interesting spin. i doubt that this reaction of the "game press" will influence the number of games sold in the end. At the end of the day, it's just free publicity. Those who care about the content of this news message are already interested...

well, oblivion has its audience. it's fine for casual gamers and those who aren't into the genre. it has nice visuals and the gameplay doesn't have any fundamental flaws. problem is that it totally doesn't work for people who enjoy rpgs with depth, such as arcanum, morrowind to some point...

hello, i've been lurking the forum for a few years. Now i finally signed up and started posting. I was looking for a way to say hello but didn't spot this post. Thanks to the lastest Emil Pagiarulo article i finally found it. kudos for maintaining this great forum and keeping it PR-free.

i guess we all agree that beth won't produce a bad game at all, but a game that appeals to a whole different target group than the 'old' fanbase of fallout. see, the last games beth developed that were based on an existing franchise, were simplified and dumbed down, which in turn made them...

i agree. and I also see this as the major letdown with beth's games. The game treats you as if you are the most important person in the world. in fallout, you can just die and nothing changes for the in-game world. there doesn't have to be some cinematic sequence triggered everytime i...

oblivion is much more enjoyable if you see it as some kind of tech demo that has embedded mini games. what I don't get is why people come here again and again just to post that they don't like NMA. I don't really understand the logic behind it. NMA members* could be either biased (so it'd be...

So they happily mix fiction with facts. Kinda ruins the credibility of the article. You could put the developers of Duke Nukem on top position as well, because if it would be released in 2008 and be as good as announced, it'd surely beat most of the other games. and please... less failchan...

Can do that :D

I am quite surprised by Beth's courage to release these screens. To put it quite mildly, they look - uninspiring. No colors, no lightning, NOTHING new or exciting, not a single thing that would make this game stand out from all the other 3D fps games out there. The whole engine looks old and...

aww what the heck. i was planning to contribute something reasonable to the discussions in this forum but bethesta's last releases of material doesnt make that easy. yes the last screenies looked like trash. i don't care if the characters have many polygons, they look unrealistic, boring...

Ok, the important things have already been said. A few tidbits i want to add: for me, the most important thing with atmosphere and gameplay in FO1+2 was: Most of the decisions you made had a good and a bad effect. If you helped the one side, the other side had to suffer. there usually wasn't...

Some people just don't get it that the reason for most of the negative critique is that Bethesta is forcing their game to be canon, and the official sequel, tho it misses very important parts of the original games. therefore, many of the things that are heavily discussed and criticised here...