Search results

The game is months away and the engine is brand new. I doubt they're reusing much as gamebryo is not by them. Then again the Source engine reused old q3 engine parts and was hailed as the nonplusultra.

In the end the Ip will be handed over to the community and Interplay, Bethesda and Oblivion have to work together to build a fallout based on a concept entirely made by the community itself.

I thought the same thing and they should be intelligent enough to come to the same conclusion. All in all I still think Obsidian would do the best job on an own Fo5, better than the company Interplay as of today. @Ausir: Is there some more information about your appeal?

I mean, look at the sign at the beginning, that alone looks like being done in 5 minutes with paint. And the last 30 seconds are really without any sound? Well yeah, compared to that at least death cannot be much of a disappointment.

It works because of the shop exclusives stuff which is directly handled as DLC.

In the end its the opinion of a single person, nothing more, nothing less and the person didn't even play f1 and f2, so for most of you this news is something to be put aside.

I enjoyed it. :)

I think ME2 had an epic story, but not every single game needs to have a story of epic scale, for fallout something like that simply does not fit (as seen in fo3) so I'd be glad if NV has not an epic, but simply a good story fitting into the proportions of the setting and the area.

Then it is taste, for me it brought some nice gear, dialogues and very intense scenes, the leveldesign was amazing in this one.

If all DLCs would be like General Knoxx for Borderlands or Overlord for Mass Effect 2 I'd buy every single one.

I'd say it is due to the angle and the fact that the gun is nearer to the "camera".

The only thing that fanbase/brand loyalty explain, if anything, is the guarantee of a number of sales, by logic no more than the number of sales of the previous game (and that is considering that EVERYONE who bougt it liked it enough to buy the new one, which is a stretch). If the new...

I bought the game myself, I just think the hype is unneeded, it's a game between 80-90 points, depending on taste and preference, but all those 96% and whatever are simply, I don't know, it is like they think they have to give it that much no matter what because it's part two of the great starcraft.

Everything you say is opinion and point of view, not a single person can say a full truth or fact per se, it is still all a matter of point of view.

Alright, you've proven me wrong.

Of course shooters date back then, but show me one shooter of these times with the same complexity as fallout 1 had, only a single one. This genre needed till the last 10 years to even adopt an inventory system and something called dialogues. Back then a Fallout shooter would never have...

*fixed :)* The evidence: "It's not how the gaming industry works." ->Industry is capitalistic thus following supply and demand, if there'd be a demand, (and there ARE such games out there, or were, BUT they sold less and less, the days of the last decades are today "only" arcade titles)...

Some, not all of course, act like that, yes. Like children putting there hands onto their ears saying: lallalalallaa, can't hear you. Some simply have to bend every single word so it fits to their opinion. When he says he hates fallout 3, they're happy, when he says he didn't hate it they say...

You simply have to accept that some person's worlds would be destroyed if such a person would like fallout 3, even when he's honest with it. :o And what about the word hardcore? The majority today simply likes games to be more entertaining and relaxing than extremely hard. Only the inner...

Sounds, in many points, like SWG, a game were all the loot were ressources to create items by players, it was a dream.