Search results

Yeah, sorry. Got distracted I see this a lot, and I'm not sure where it comes from. I mean, sure, that's usually what happens, but it's not a deciding factor in whether the game is good or not.

That stuff is what I'm referring to when I say that it's more similar to than differing from. I just think that the change from turn based to first person is a positive one. Or at least a value neutral change.

I'm pretty sure I can be. I definitely didn't say either of those things.

They had a limited amount of money but this only meant that they wouldn't pay more than that amount for anything, but could do so as often as they wanted.

That's a joke, I even pointed out that it was part of a joke in the ellipsised part that you purposefully omitted to make me look like a troll. He's complaining about people not giving it the benefit of the doubt while claiming also that FO3 causes cancer. If you can't beat 'em, call 'em names.

I couldn't say it any better.

Demonstrably false. I don't misinterpret your arguments on purpose, and any case where I have done so I acknowledge it. Yes, it is. Right, so you can give them pea shooters so they don't hurt you if you hit them. Oh, and say try not to hit me (but spray everyone else who's friendly). It's one...

I can't believe I'm saying this, but please don't recreate the end of Requiem for a Dream with Samus. Please.

I played Fallout 2 first. It was definitely still a gameplay issue. I'm making the assumption that if one of 'em played it, he realized that it was an issue. Seeing as I've never met anyone who played it who didn't realize it was an issue, that's not much of a leap. We're talking about a...

I don't think you'd know the benefit of the doubt if it came up and asked to borrow money after having finished its degree and got a good high paying job.

If I had a PC capable of playing it I'd be worried about the hidden bugs, as it is, I'm worried about the lack of patches.

That friendly fire was an issue. It's more than one, then? Then they know it's an issue. Show me where I said anything like that. Ever. Yeah, that's real core gameplay shit right there. You didn't read what they said on that subject, clearly. How old does one have to be to have played Fallout...

Um. Wow. I expect that they will because they're familiar with Fallout and how having companions often got you killed. They know it was a problem and that makes me think that they may have put some effort toward fixing it. It's complete speculation.

First some douchebag decides to call it "fallout in name only" and now this!? (I know you're just poking fun) In all seriousness though, this is my biggest concern with Fallout 3. I can only get the PS3 version and I hope they learned something from the bugginess of Oblivion. edit: That...

Yes, I expect the followers to shoot me less often. I never called anyone that, first. Second I've said repeatedly that there are good reasons for it and that focusing on this is creepy.

If interplay was "ubber pwnage" they wouldn't have had to sell the Fallout name. Really, more than Bethesda, you should be mad at Interplay for this whole thing. Also for not putting out stable games.

Quoting this to point out that no one in this thread is doing this and stop saying it. Your avatar is perfect for this. Look at the guy on the left. Should he play the comedian? Then look at the right Holy shit, that's the comedian! Making CHA less of a dump stat. Because you can only have...

Why do you assume Fallout fans all hate it? This forum is not a microcosm of Fallout fandom, it's the most militant wing. They're almost as bad as the dumb expressions of kids at a keyboard and mouse.

Fuck off. I've played a grand total of one Bethesda game. I have, however, committed the cardinal sin of thinking that Fallout 3 doesn't look like shit, which is apparently like shooting your mothers. It seems that way, yet you haven't played the game yet. I'm a Fallout fan, and I like how it...

The sequel is for the PC, and the two more powerful consoles.