Search results

How many of these review round-ups do we need anyway? I think it's safe to get the pattern here - They like the game, you guys don't like the game. There, I've just summarized all of these threads so far, and probably the ones that are to come as well. Seriously, I'm getting kinda pissed...

What's said is, in the end, Bioshock will probably end up being a better Fallout 3 than...Fallout 3.

I loved Todd's explanation on who their target audience is. Apparently, they are aiming for people who go to the store and ask "what's cool?"...Oh yeah, you're in the right direction guys.

Heh, ad hominem much?

Ah, thanks for clearing up the thing with the Enclave. It's just that I couldn't make out what exactly they looked like. So, if you're NOT going to rush to get the power armor (either you don't want to, or don't know how to), then what's the problem of having to take a perk later in the game...

OK, things I liked: 1. The karma thing. I dunno how they will actually make it, but it SOUNDED right. I kinda hate it when the games told me "Ok, you are this much good. if you get this many points more good, you will become a lot better." It was annoying. 2. Nuka cola and bottle caps. Did...

Mmmm nope. It's still ripping off WH40k. It's just that WH40k rips of Starship Troopers :) Basically, everything in the last few centuries can be explained by "X ripped off Y", so not like we are gonna get anywhere any time soon.

Wow, you made an entire post trying to point out how wrong I am, and saying all sorts of stupid stuff along the way? Now I remember why I keep visiting this place.

Jeez, it was a joke dammit.

Aw come on! Talking PCs in Diablo 3? That is just silly :lol:

Wikipedia is not a viable source of information and so on. Although it probably is true, considering Warcraft's units were just the same thing, except with a different image.

No it would be revolutionary if it did anything groundbreaking and original. Also, I never said Diablo or any of the other games, weren't good. That was actually quite the opposite of my point. The games might not have original ideas but they are very good at what they are. Duke Nukem 3D...

Diablo 1: Gameplay - tuned down real-time combat version of a roguelike. Setting - Well, dark fantasy. Not exactly original or anything. Diablo 2: Gameplay - Hack'n'Slash action game with RPG elements. Setting - See above. Warcraft 1-2: Gameplay - Normal RTS. Make buildings, make...

...So, what? It's impossible for one to like both Elvis and the Beatles, and in the same way - Both Fallout and Diablo? What kind of a close-minded way of thinking is that?

And here I always thought that role playing games were about...ya know, role playing. Eh, but what do I know, right? Diablo was never an RPG people, the roguelikes which Diablo 1 was trying to copy are NOT RPGs, even though they seem like such (mostly because, hey, they don't have any friggin...

Seriously, to me Blizzard have never been good at making original and innovative games. They like playing it safe. Ya know, take this idea from here, take that from there, polish it, recolor it - sell it. But they are good at it. They see that if something works, it doesn't need to be fixed...

Pff, of course they listen to feedback. That's not the problem. The problem is they don't accept that feedback and still do things their way.

Read trough the thread. It might be a good idea. The card was so "meh" it's not even funny. It lacks any originality in it's concept at all. Political correctness is one of the most silly things I see nowadays. It's Christmas. People celebrate it. They shove it in your face. Live with it...

First off, lemme just say this: nobody forces you to like Fallout *hides under the table until the stoning ends then comes back out again* It's a great game, no doubt about that. But nobody forces you to like it. I know a lot of people, a lot of RPG players to, who played it and just didn't like...

Actually 5 isn't all that bad. It's pretty much 3 but with prettier graphics.