Search results

I was just using the same argument from the begining.I n my point of view. But still I am happy that you finally get the idea.Then I do not need the answer all the other quotes you sent since it doesnt add anything to the idea anyway.(Believe me I could ).And the thing I wrote was an "example"...

I didnt say I dont have any ideas about how it can be done I just said its not that hard to think of some basic solutions thats all.Please just not paraphrase everything in your mind so that suits your idea of logic.Some times words are used just for what they are meant for. So when did...

So what? you think its not important and I think it is.Its important for me "not to see" my behind when there is chance of this feature to be in the game.I think it adds to the feel and strategy.You dont think so thats fine by me but still there is no logical statement in your sentence that...

I said "more realistic" not just "realistic".I think my formula is "better" in representing than the one used now.We can all together remove the weight also what would it matter that much?But the more we are walking away from a realistic representation the harder it becomes to get into...

Yes NOX sucks I know :) Still I cant see why its frustrating or fucks combat.Lets say for 3 action point you could turn around or maybe none.Thats not so bad,hardly it fucks tactical combat.Also imagine a turn going on an something like that is read on pipboy "You are shot from behing for 20...

When the Fallout came out the Westwood studios launched a game that could be called a Diablo clone;NOX. In NOx character couldnt see the 90 degrees of his back which was constantly covered with Fog of War.But ofcourse when the character changed view angel the Fog of War changed also blocking...

Still only snipers wouldnt cut it in my opinion. There are heavy weapons in the means of "weight" in the game.Imagine holding a minigun it would take you a while to carry and turn the thing to your next target if he is in an angle of 90 degrees.So its hard to aim if you are in close combat...

I like throwing weapons and highly disagree that they cannot be made usefull. They could cause more criticals maybe with hands and such stuff or can be used to disarm somebody. Well ıf you want to see a "real" example of usefull usage of thrown weapons see Starship troopers scene after...

Hmm okay I thought he was refering to all weapons. So Simply put an AK-47 has no place in fallout but some gun resembling that can be put,is it so? And I thought he was refering to my post for smoke grenades and axes.So they are no problem at all since they are "classic"s :D. And NO! to...

What does that mean actually?Supposed to be some kind of irony or something?

No I didnt notice it since my hit chance was nearly always %95 for called shots. If thats so insignificant it has no point. I mean "real" caps such as "not using"the gun or hit chances below "%50" and such.

ı want guns that require dual skills like ıt benefits or gets penaltilised for both skills Such as Plazma gatling=Heavy+energy Powerclaw=energy+unarmed Maybe some shotgun with a knife at the end so that you could hit the guy in melle with it.(melle+small guns) Some Flash and Smoke...

ı actually kind of wondered how you could aim a sniper rifle correctly with scoop to somebody just standing beside you. It would be more realistic if big and some energy weapons could not be used or atleast properly used from some minimum range. Like the sniper rifle requiring minimum...

Okay thank you for your time. I still think Fallout could be online though. But I wont discuss it. Still I have seen forums where it is kept organised(like DOW Forums) but anyway I can imagine what crap will be posted.So I dont blame you for not bothering;Its a huge job.

Yeah I know there is a Fallout 3 discusion place but it could be more organised I mean. It could be more lets say "official" to hold up ideas if the forum moderators actually opened a thread that keeps being organised and summarised by the moderators. I couldnt quite get the "FOOLs...

Since Fallout 3 and (hopefully) Fallout Online is coming maybe we should open a detailed wishlist sub forum. I mean the first place to look for Fallout 3 is always the "No Mutants Allowed" site.So why dont we take the lead. I am a newbie on the forum but been an "oldbie" since the begining...