Search results

Well, I shall oblige you. Age of Empires I (1997), sold three million copies by 2000. By 2001 Diablo I, also from 1997, had sold 2.5 million copies. Crash Bandicoot 2, 1997, sold 800,000 copies by 98, and has sold 5.6Million copies as of today. Super Mario 64, 1996, sold 11million...

I don't support a team, but i'll just pretend to 'keep an eye on Tottenham' and look like a fan to show those NFL guys!

Ever jumped in third person?

Name: Leo Age: 27 Build: Tall and well built Height: 6" Attributes: Leo is a talented gunman, is adept at stealth and is highly diplomatic. He is athletic and can evade some combat situations, and is quite handsome, giving him some advantages with the ladies. Bio: Leo is a...

combat looks like it'll just be Bioshock 2 with giant rats.

Oh dear, mushrooms in a salad.

FO1 sold a couple hundred thousand of copies. Now, it will have sold millions and up, due to re releases, and Fallout 3 and such, but it was hardly the MW2 of it's day. Most of the accolades have been awarded post 2005, and reviews are nowhere near universally acclaiming, you'll find a few...

Didn't FO3 sell 4M copies or somthing, also, Bethesda published WET, Rouge Warrior, quite a few other games, profited on New Vegas of course, and all the DLC must have earned them a few million to say the least.

No but the avergae New Vegas player dosen't want to play it. @Ilosar, I second your last point. FO1 didn't exactly sell alot. It was a very niche game, not 'widley' acclaimed or whatever.

Betrayal at Krondor hardly has a mainstream appeal nowadays

Recomending Wolfenstein 3D, or Doom in a COD:Black Ops review wouldn't make alot of sense. You liked Medal of Honour? Try Duke Nukem!

Leo squatted down, his knees cracking loudly as he rested on the jutting rock, slinging his Kar around his head, and throwing it gently onto the floor in a single motion. He unfastened his belt a notch, taking care to dust it off with his cuff, he was quite proud of his newfound pre-war buckle...

You sir, made a good analogy.

Again. It's not the programmers decision, or the concept artist's decision to take the franchise a certain way. I'd rather see Interplay afloat, than bankrupt and leaving many unemployed. It's an industry like any other.

'Lolz interplay dezerv teh fail they amke the bad gamez with fallout in dem roflmaocopter' It's a corporation. The poor guys who are making the inevitable flop of Fallout Online have to support a family. They aren't responsible for the idiocy that has been occuring, over many years.

You didn't reply to my post, and as your using this site as free advertising I think you atleast owe the community something. Ever actually played Fallout 1? I rareley used VATS. I didn't use it, because it was less effective than my own twitch skills, which don't translate to sucsess as...

Just like how Todd saw European gamers were using third person, and said he'd make it more useable. Or when he was designing FO3 and said it was playable from third person. Or when Obsidian told us they adapted FO3's third person for NV, and it was playable.

Any game could be completed by a bot, maybe with the exception of this one, due to the horrible multi floored system which gives no indication as to where the arrow lies, and the fact you have to manually make them active quests for the arrow to be present, and that a bot would probably be less...

The problem is systemic throughout the game. The way the factions are implimented and used, it just dosen't work. You get half way, when all of a sudden there is one point when these quests veer off from one another, the whole design needs to be reworked, no more starting in Goodsprings etc...

Not far. The casinos kick you out after a relativley paltry ammount of winnings