Search results

1. The main quest's antagonist(s) must adhere to one thematic philosophy or theme whose purpose is to challenge the player's views. 2. Bring back F1's rule for references. If a player does not recognize a reference, they should not even realize one is being presented. 3. No 4th wall breaks...

This, right here, proves your bias. Super corrupt company getting their hands on something they shouldn't in the world of Fallout. More "stupid" than mutated beasts achieving sentience. Okey dokey then.

Sorry, but Norzan is right about this point. Project Purity is pretty retarded. I think that may have been intentional actually. The only reason it purifies is because of the GECK which wasn't originally part of its construction. Talking deathclaws. That is all.

I do find myself agreeing with you here in everything you've said. Fallout 3 is not a serious game. It tries to have a serious tone but goes back wacky wasteland hijinks at the drop of a hat. But to me there's appeal there nontheless. It's not a perfect game, but it does have its own groove.

The issue I think Norzan has is that he has boxed the concept of what "Fallout" is in his mind and if it doesn't agree with that concept it's automatically bad. I'm certain he will disagree, but that's what it seems to be. I'm not saying he is wrong for thinking this way, but it does seem to be...

Now here's a game many here believe they would have wanted over F3 but the truth is, Van Buren would have been scorned even more. That one was going to take silly to a whole new level. You have a giant robot hounding you through the course of the game like some Robo-Nemesis. You have ghoul...

I've seen people here say Many A True Nerd is a shill for Bethesda. I was subbed to him back when he started out and only did NV videos but dropped him ages ago. Is it because of the video that birthed this thread? I saw his "analysis" on 76 and he didn't come off as a shill. His video came...

That's acceptable. You don't need to praise anything. Constructive criticism of any kind that isn't just "bad, garbage" and one sentence long is what I was looking for. If I had played the originals right after initially disliking F3, I'd be in your shoes right now most likely. I said I...

So the good fight has taken its toll and now he's reduced to this...

I thought we could have a pleasant back and forth where I knew I would not be able to convince you but still enjoy the stimulating exchange. I guess not.

It's a good video game; balanced, decent voice acting, good music, not too buggy for the sheer amount of content, still holds up graphically and the list goes on. It just falls short of Fallout 1 which is objectively a superior product and the argument can be made that it is indeed "art" as...

So where does F:NV fit into this seeing as you did not mention it. Did it dodge this "curse of incompetence" you seem to be describing? Because that game was made by people that worked on F2. I can only remember Chris Avellone but I'm sure there were others.

Disclaimer because this be No Mutants Allowed; I'm not defending F3, there are just some things you said that I want to address. Can you blame them? Fallout 2 is widely more beloved and even though I prefer F1 more, I can objectively say F2 is better. It was an obvious decision to base F3 on the...