Search results

(lol, ect).

This is some hard-hitting counterjournalism. I have an idea: since the whole "[familiar]" thing is really just a stupid aside, let's talk FO4 for a second (cover your ears, TG): Where would you set the next game? I'm just going to assume DC gets blown to kingdom come (again) and part 4 moves...

Fallout 4! Yay!

I like how this guy manages to relate his general positivity through highlighting details we haven't heard about a zillion times, but I guess he also has the benefit of a late start. Whatever, good read. Oh, and does being written by someone in the UK count as "European?" Magic 8-Ball was...

You're right, the Simpsons' Comic Book Guy method is far superior :wink:

- If my advice doesn't apply to you feel free to ignore it. - Not shooting the messenger: a reward? Interesting. - My agenda? Go on, I'm intrigued.

Way to shoot the messenger. Wasn't it, though? Say, when are they going to abandon this whole failed "internet" experiment, anyways? There could've been another page of inquiries into how much Tom Chick is getting paid by Bethesda, easy. :wink:

Statements like that, specifically, are one reason why places like NMA and the Codex get singled out. Also: "console crowd/idiots/kiddieZ," ect. Given the righteous indignation over this newspost, you'd think the follies of describing those that don't agree with you simply in terms of negative...

More like "Best Game of the Show." Don't worry, it might still make some "worst of" lists in a few Eurpean mags :wink:

I'm fucking psychic. I should write for Wired! In the BB blog guy's opinion it was a review. Argue with him, not me. But since I know you really want to argue with me anyways, I'll just state that the Wired guy's opinion certainly does smack of absolute finality. I'd say there's as much...

Yeah MY BAD and everything. I meant to type "the Watchmen trailer" but I posted it while I was "sleepy." It's been rectified. At least I got it right in the link :| Don't forget the overtly homosexual overtones (in each case).

Man, I so wanted to post that here when I first saw it, but just assumed it would be deleted (foul tip). Here's someone else not so high on the Wired "review."

Haha, "infiltration." The game comes out in like 3 months - certainly you'd expect the readership to the biggest fansite to spike a little in anticipation of that, right? Just wait till after it's released :shock:

. Well, considering that those adaptations have already come and gone while being largely terrible, and as such the future lies nowhere but up, I'm already intrigued. In the vast majority of of those cases you don't wait to be surprised or disappointed? I... submit...

Alone? The buzz around the net is generally positive about this, and we're talking hard-core comic nerds here. And it's worth pointing out that the final film is expected to be just under (or perhaps over) 3 hours, with the one major omission being the Black Freighter comic parallel angle. But...

Just wow. Maybe we should just discuss the trailer.

"They" weren't Zack Snyder. Consider what he's previously done with adapting a graphic novel to film. Or just watch the trailer and say, "Holy shit, they've at least nailed the look!"

The only thread I could find that was close was about Alan Moore, and featured this comment: Watchmen trailer.

I wasn't referring to any preview in particular, I was making a prediction, generally. The quote I yanked from your post just struck me as funny - is the rest of the article overtly negative in your opinion? I haven't even read the Gamekult preview, much less the thread. There's already a...

He has... the sight! I predict the more negative impressions will largely be accepted as more trustworthy (Magic 8-Ball was consulted).