Search results

They broke it in the very first game they made by ruining a bunch of stuff from the Wes Coast (Harold, GECK, BoS, Enclave, Super Mutants, all ruined in Fallout 3). So Bethesda doesn't need to make a game in West Coast to ruin stuff from it.

It's funny seeming people say that one bad game is better than the other. Really, who cares? No one should care, both games are bad. Play the good ones and avoid the bad ones, our time in this world is finite.

I can just play actual good games instead of bad ones.

That whole scene is like three minutes long and they obliterate Mr. House's character with so much efficiency that it feels like it was done with spite. Same with Sinclair, representing the Big MT when he was just a client. Now can you imagine a whole season of this?

I don't like neither game.

The game that sold incredibly well and still has a legion of fans doesn't need more of those. I hated this game far before i came here or was aware that this game over time criticized for its many flaws (and rightfully mind you). So, yes, i still hated this game in a vaccum separate from...

I know the show makes Mr. House behaves the exact opposite of how he's portrayed in New Vegas. It's like they saw a dude in a suit with a mustache and instantly thought he was just some evil capitalist that only cares about money. But season 2 is seemingly going to take place in New Vegas, so...

A case of where it being removed would be the better option. The East Coast had no business having FEV and Super Mutants.

Watch all New Vegas companions be dead in the second season.

The fact that you can get so horribly overpowered in the games after the second one is why i get so bored with them. Even after getting upgraded guns in Far Cry 2 you are not casually mowing down dozens with ease and you don't have those broken takedown moves that turn the game into a complete...

Bethesda is the one that poisoned the community. If they hadn't made games that are so different in terms of tone, gameplay, writing quality, depth of rpg elements and so on from the first two games, maybe the fanbase wouldn't be so divided.

Damn, that is something i wish i could join. Maybe one day. Why is it on November 16th? Is there any significance to that date? The game came out October 19th, that would have made more sense. And that tweet from the Fallout account is hilarious because the NCR and Legion never have a battle...

Only works when you have actual evidence, which you never do. You just claim that someone hasn't played the game when your argument is shit and you can't counter the other person's argument. Edit: You are seriously arguing that a repeatable sidequest where you TRAVEL with a caravan is NOT a...

We have reached a point that someone correcting you is a bad thing. Also, what in the fuck does someone correcting you about something you got wrong have to do with enjoying a game? I fail to see the correlation. Edit: Lol, they deleted the video.

Do not touch 1, 2 and New Vegas, leave them as they are. I don't care about the rest, Bethesda can remake their shitty games all it wants.

Is this gonna be the bullshit you always resort to when you have no argument?

Fallout 4's shitty writing and garbage artstyle are not the only bad things about the game. The dumbed down rpg elements, the garbage dialogue system, the bad enemy AI, the mediocre at best shooting, the horrendous level scaling that makes every enemy a bullet sponge, the pointless exploration...

Don't think you needed to be a fan of New Vegas to predict that Starfield was gonna be bad. Because Bethesda hasn't made good games since 2006.

There is a giant difference between some rewrites and giant retcons that have massive consequences. It's clear Bethesda and the writers of the show have no respect for the license, they just see ways to make profit by using recognizable iconography and by turning Fallout into some goofy...