Search results

Good poll man. I have a feeling the results might be lopsided, at least from the vocal minority.

Hi. New here? As for epooks, she's the wife of a former BIS dev who worked on the Fallout series.

I've become heavily involved in "Wa Shin Ryu" Jujutsu. It's a system that adds elements of Judo and Aikido to Jujutsu. It's a very good workout, and very much a style of actual fighting. We're taught how to take out, disable, maim, and kill our opponents. If anyone is interested, this is the...

These are from the original Fallout? It kinda looks like some teenage fanart :?

So what's your point?

That would make sense if companies like Haliburton weren't already in Iran, having lucrative deals with the Iranian government. What possible benefit could they have by the US invading? Disruption of production? Loss of profit? Also, I guess you don't look at links...

Under $3000, but I'd like to keep it at least under $2500

Well, I probably wouldn't get a slate tablet. I'd definitely get one of the convertible ones if I was to get a tablet. As for what I'd be doing...it's a congressional internship, so I'd probably be going to lots of committee meetings, making presentations for the senator, other intern stuff...

So I've got a new internship for next semester, and I'm going to need a mobile computer for it. I can't decide whether to get a laptop or tablet PC, however. It seems that tablet pcs are definitely not as powerful as laptops, but I've never used a tablet PC so I wouldn't know where to begin a...

I'm misinformed?? The United States actually produces 8.69 million barrels per day, and that number is INCREASING due to all the new drilling legislation. The only countries that produce more oil per day are Russia (9.27 million bpd) and Saudi Arabia (10.37 million bpd). Ok...I can't...

Why would the US need to invade Iran for oil? To take the prices down a couple of cents? No. It's plainly stupid to think so. The US has plenty of oil as it is, and more and more drilling is going to be taking place, thereby increasing already high domestic production. Nevermind the fact...

Please enlighten me as to how it is for oil. I know its not, but I would like to see your logic.

I can't believe I'm asking this, but you guys don't actually think this is for oil, do you?

Come on Welsh, you're smarter than that. :wink:

For the record, I disagree with Bush on most of his domestic views, and I can't really disagree with him on his international views because I don't think he even knows what they are yet.

Ok...99% of the people in Iraq voted Saddam becaue they were scared they would be killed if they voted for anyone else. And who doesn't want to be free, Kotario? Who doesn't want to be able to have the power to elect their own rulers, or have the chance to represent the people themselves...

Oh NOES! A Sekret weapon! You make it sound like they have a doomsday device. The more likely scenario is that they will use biological and chemical weapons. Iran "has manufactured and stockpiled chemical weapons, including blister, blood, and choking agents." Central Intelligence Agency...

That's probably the most ignorant thing I've ever heard. As for why we should have gone into Iran in 1979. When the Islamists took over and seized the US embassy, that was the first "terror" attack as we know it today. Instead of waiting around for over a year, and trying pathetic rescue...

Iran. We should have gone into Iran back in 1979. If the hostage crisis was stamped out immediately, so many more lives would have been saved later on.

It's all about Realist politics. Everyone who offered aid has something to gain by doing so.