Search results

So the show stays pretty true to the book in that sense? I guess I'll have to pick up a copy of it.

Any good?

Hmm, how can you say that Mass Effect and Assassins Creed will be the best games ever? Have you played them? :roll:

http://www.columbinegame.com/

Isn't that what some editors are for? To help steer authors in trouble in the right direction, give helpful comments etc.

Isn't Supreme Commander very demanding as well?

Also, has there been any mention of critical failures? With homemade weapons one would expect some (i.e. more frequent) backfiring, accidental explosions etc.

Anyone else notice on the fourth page, in the "crash course" in Fallout history, under the FO:TicTac screenshot. Hmm, if the eastward expansion of BoS isn't canon, then what would that make FO3's story? Not canon at least.

Some textbooks on Linear Algebra and Advanced Calculus. Then I'm currently reading A Spot of Bother by Mark Haddon, the same author of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, which I highly recommend. If I have some spare time I might read Don Quixote. Any fans of Neil Gaiman here...

VATS is nowhere near TB, since VATS seems to only work for you. It's not TB if you can move while your enemies and allies are taking their "turn." And on the note that VATS is throwing us TB fans a bone, FUCK YOU. It's more of a slap in the face really, a stupid gimmick to try and include...

Am I the only one afraid that talking yourself out of a sticky situation will be all too easy (low IN and CH with little or no speech required)? And about the bolded sentences, we all know THE biggest part of Fallout was the brutality as Bethsoft is telling us.

4. You forgot to mention comic books. 8. Nothing against having it set elsewhere. 9. Although that would be most logical it's not necesary, both Fallouts had weapons which are more related to modern weapons than pre-60's. 13. & 16. No need to mention this twice. But yes aimed shots are a big...

Are you fucking stupid? Strike that, we already know the answer. The original developers, the guys who gave birth to Fallout (not the ones who bought the franchise...) have said so, and if they are not the authority on the matter, WHO THE FUCK IS? (excuse the caps). And again with the 2d/3d...

I guess I should introduce myself properly. Am a 22 year old Icelandic father and devoted Fallout fan. Have been playing Fallout since 1999. Have been an on and off again reader of NMA for about 3 years. Am an undergrad in physics at my local university. Which about sums it up.

Innuendo, you mention DX and it's multiple endings. Let's see, did it matter how you played the game on what ending you got? No, in other words what you did in the course of the game had no consequences whatsoever on the outcome of the game. You tell me to read the article written on...

Wow, I'm almost at the point that I never want to come back here. Not because of the NMA elitists, but because of stupid trolls who have nothing better to but post illogical and idiotic posts about how those of us who dislike the direction fallout 3 is heading are morons for stating our opinion...

Firstly, you mention that NWN was ruined by the game engine. Really? It's not like the developers can use another one... Concerning isometric in 3D, didn't most people here, amongst others, like the look and feel of the Van Buren project? Secondly, correct me if I'm wrong but didn't quite a...

:wall:

You sir are a complete and utter moron.

The thing is, most of us here are not liking the what we see the final outcome as, you can't tell us that we can't or shouldn't because it's our fucking right as human beings to form our own opinions. Gameplay is as important as the story, if you don't enjoy playing the game, how are you...