Search results

If this even gets to court and it looks like it could go Interplay's way, Zenimax would just end up paying more for Fallout's rights. Zenimax had too much invested in the IP now to allow it to go away. Interplay might get royalties on future Fallout titles for example.

Look at the RPG category: Tales of Vesperia, Fable II, Fallout 3, Sonic Chronicles, and Star Ocean. Its a bunch of bad choices left up to a bunch of G4tv.com readers.

Well not now, but this is THE FUTURE!

Bethesda's target audience makes themselves known: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dfoVqhQVyQ

But thats much more Appalachia then Southern Gothic. Hatfields and McCoys vs huge mansions in swamps. Now clans fighting over marijuana, meth labs and the last Mountain Dew plant, that would be Appalachia.

Wow Left 4 Dead 2 is really going the Southern Gothic route huh? Oh, wait my mistake. Seriously did someone put off doing their DLC presentation to read Preacher comics and so this is all they had to show?

Please explain how DLC is oh so different from expansion packs. Thanks. Sometimes lack of money can lead to bad QA (Troika) but Bethesda is rolling in money, they just don't care. Blizzard wouldn't even do a beta test on something as buggy as Bethesda's final releases.

Bethesda just doesn't care because they know they'll never get called out on releasing terribly buggy games. And I'm sure that has nothing to do with Bethesda paying for the games media to flyout and have a London vacation...

You would think the fact that Bethesda had to go back and change the ending because it didn't work would give everyone who voted for this award pause, but I doubt it. A big problem here is that the number of people voting for this who actually played the game to completion was probably miniscule.

I really don't know where to put this, but has anyone come up with any type of reason why Bethesda had to fly out the gaming press to London to make these announcements? And yes Bethesda is picking up the tab for everyone there.

Nothing makes more sense than comparing sales of a PC only game to a game released on 2 consoles and the PC

Actually more likely than being able to get a D20 game because they would be seriously constrained by a rule set is that they are going to get the Vampire:The Masquerade license just in time to capitalize on Twilight mania!

Anytime you see the word immersive in a Fallout 3 opinion piece you know you're dealing with an iconoclast. A rebel who is willing to take on the man!

This article doesn't really absolve Mr. Jones of much but does tell us some things about the gaming press we sort of knew but now really know. First that impressions come more from peers than the actual game in many cases. 10 hours into a 40 hour game isn't enough to critique it. Thats like...

RPGs to Come Well Persona 4 releases in a week and will likely make most sites top 5 and win a few awards. But with Square's two titles falling somewhat flat, Fallout 3 seems to have a clear walkover. Which gets me to why I just can't really believe most FO 3 reviews. The...

6 weeks out isn't early build time. Yes the graphics may get a little bit of luster added on but the engine has been set for a while now. Bethesda will continue one Fallout tradition, releasing a buggy game.

Nanobots!

My problem with the combat system as its described now seems like to make sure VATS was useful Bethesda upped the encounter difficulty. That means that except for encounters where you you totally outmatch the enemy you're going to use VATS, which of course destroys any reason to moving to real...

It also has to do with the fact many of these come from blog posts and blog writers are paid based on page views. So they'll have a teaser paragraph in hopes that you'll click through to the story and make them an extra 2 cents.