Search results

I had to restore my computer to the original factory settings & reinstall everything. After installing FOT, I created a character, saved him & then remembered Springfield so I opened bos in core & changed "false" to "true" but was told I did not have permission so I could not "save." I don't...

Well then I would say it's "much ado about nothing."

I've found that walking in wearing the black leather jacket found in Vault 15 the raiders react like they're seeing a "ghost" & Garl thinks I'm his father come back to life & I have the option of demanding the release of Tandi. I don't know what goes along with that in Luck & Charisma.

I really wish I could see the above video scenario played out in person. I watch it over & over & have no idea hiow it is actually accomplished. I cannot do it myself. Sigh!

I can understand the original question & the reason for posing it, but - unless I'm missing something - if the mutants "win" then the game as such immediately ends because the only really important goal in the game is the Vault getting a water chip. Once that is in any way made impossible...

Why not? It's only a premise after all. Darwin arbitrarily changed a premise & successfully substituted his own. (Or did he?) In any case, turning your back on your vault & joining the enemy historically means you have no friends. Both sides are going to hate you. But heck, it's only a game...

No, the vats are not available as a possibility period. During the course of the game both the vats are destroyed & the Master is killed. Period. All we have is the mutants - in one small corner of the world. Their only hope is to be assimilated into society - otherwise sooner or later they will...

We're talkng about one small locality - southern California. So how many mutants could there be? There are no vats - they've been destroyed, remember?

That is just plain silly & isn't even worth presenting evidence to the contrary. Humans would eventually be able to kill off the mutants should they so desire, just by virtue of the fact that there would be more of them because they could reproduce.

I see it but am still befuddled

Here's the proof.... <iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/WzSOKi_t5fg" frameborder="0"></iframe>

What's dishonest about using the turrets? They're a legitimate part of the game. If you fire at Horrigan, you'll draw his fire, turrets or not.

....FO1 - or in the case of FO2 "....in half an hour." However, RP has unfortunately made that impossible for FO2. Nevertheless since the GECK is also located in the Enclave everything that needs to be accomplished to finish the game can be done through SF so all else is "frosting on the cake."...

There are things that never change no matter how many developmental changes FO2 goes through & that is the idiocy involved in vaious encouters especially with the manti. Just recently I met up with Willy the Trader in the vicinity of Modoc. I have met up with him quite a number of times & like...

TY OK TY U both for your input. I was purposely being sort of extreme in my attitude because I thought I might be wrong, & I was. "....mercenaries posing as raiders" says it best I guess.

Aside from saving Shadow-Who-Walks's life, why should I want to allow the raiders themselves to leave their hideout "peacefully"? They are sure to continue their malicious marauding & killing on the Wasteland. They are nothing but scum & should be exterminated. "The best raider is a dead...

Not Useless The dogs in FO are from being "useless" as has been claimed. Not only are they capable of making significant hits on the enemy & even kills, but at the very least they draw the enemy's attention away from you.

K-9 I don't know whether it's because I enjoy dogs but the dogs of FO I do basically enjoy just because they act so much like dogs. I don't mean any disrespect to Per Jorner but i disagree with his negative assessment of Dogmeat & K-9 in his justly celebrated walkthrough. Hits & kills by those...

OK - thank you very much for your explanations! :-)