That's not even close to what I was implying though. I was jokingly making a point about how Fallout 3 clearly wasn't taken seriously by its developers, which you then declared a 'non-argument' because apparently some lazy Fallout 4 writer said something similar once to defend his lack of familiarity with the source material. I really don't see why you would even disagree on this given your past stance on things. It really just feels like you want to argue with me by attributing opinions to me which I don't possess. Of course, but that doesn't automatically make Fallout 3 a bad game. It just makes it a horrible entry in the Fallout series.