Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'General Gaming and Hardware Forum' started by Maphusio, Oct 3, 2004.
Anyone think this will be worth buying? Will it ease my itchen' for fallout 3?
Looks decent. I'm gonna check it out.
Link please, sucka.
1) we b way too lazy to google. if you bring up a game to discuss at least have the impulse to provide some basic information such as the url of the official webby.
2) are you questioning an order of an emperial inquisitor? way too go dude, i hope you like torture...
Sure why not... I love the post apocalypse.
If you like it... I kinda don't. But, hey! Im not you.
Doesnt sound too bad. I dont like the whole time travelling back into 1958 part of the plot. Also, it's not post nuclear but "nuclear war in progress." I wonder what they mean by "Turn based strategy" is it the combat? "20 game levels.
30 units and characters. " BAH!
Looks crap, quite frankly. Like Silent storm. "Our goose is cooked!"
Anything about 'Shadow Vault' ? It looks like a poorly done rip-off of fo2/fo:t. Anyone who's got personal experience? I saw it in the bargain bin at Gamestop..looked interesting but not worth the money without fanboy opinion. I don't think that came out right..in that iteration, fanboy was not a derogatory term. Ok, true fan opinion would be more accurate. Also, before someone mentions that it's been covered, I would like to point out that searching for 'shadow vault' reveals 2500<x hits. Please don't go ahead and try and talk shit. I'm looking for good crpgs. Thanks to all who don't flame this trying to prove their 1337'ness, it was actually meant as a serious post mebbe a bit inflammatory..?
You may want to learn how to search, then, because a search for Shadow Vault gave me some 50 odd hits, at least 4 of which are relevant. Including a news post, a thread discussing the game and someone registering to ask for technical support on a game that has nothing to do with us.
It took me all of one minute to find those threads. Of course, the fact that I did tick the 'search for all terms' option instead of the 'search for any term' option probably made the difference. Leading me, again, to the conclusion that you should learn how to search.
So, yes it has been covered, and you could've spent just a wee bit more effort like, for instance, googling for it, or fiddling a wee bit more with the search options on this forum.
Anyway, I'm merging this thread with the old thread. But let me spare you the trouble: the general consensus is that it's probably crap, and that no one has dared to try it yet
well rather than telling you to sod off I guess I'll say thank you Sander!! Thanks for saving me a few €!!
Meh...It's just meh...
Not good not generally bad though.