Search results

Well, indeed. But the idea of the Midwest BOS came up comparing to the FO3/4 BOS. I know is not an achivement, but I was not disappointed by how FO:T moved the BOS acting, besides it is a spinoff game, it is "reliable" how they've handled that. In FO3/4 BOS, it doesn't make any sense at all.

BTW all the Vault 0 lore and briefing (from BOS side) is tons of times better than any ending from FO4 or the shitty ending of FO3.

Well this topic got in discussion a lot of times. I see the midwest BOS rather different than the east coast BOS. Not intending to save the world, but sees power in recruiting defeated factions, to defeat its more powerful enemies. East Coast BOS are superheros. The impression left is...

Yes it is. And a really good one.

Don't mind putting different logos, put an ENEMY logo as the 95% of the map is hostile at sight.... :/ BTW pretty good job!

Weird. At least here in Argentina, the pocket of Rolling Stone is sold too easy. Hahaha

It is bad written on storyplay, but has some good aspects. Also it is proof with NV that a good RPG game could came up of that. Some intresting places, beside the stupid characters. Lots of years since I played it (Only one time, doesn't catch me to play it again though, I should). I think FO4...

Broken Hills always sounded to me like the place to find peace and grow old :P But definetly I would go Junktown. Don't have an explanation for this, always been my favourite since I am a kid, haha.

In other games the plot keeps scaling to surprise everytime. I remember when I discovered Lou, or the cathedral... or the Enclave, the president, etc. Those where WOOOOOOOOOOOOW moments. In 3 or 4 there aren't any. Sadly. Maybe I played it growed an adult, but thinking objectively the plot is...

Led Storm.

It's not to piss off... is to laugh. NMA has a respected reputation, a lot of other forums say this forum is strict and lives on the past world, but every decent fallout fan respects this community. Also with reviewers, maybe got another point of view but respect this view. Bethesdaboys are...

No but I mean, they don't need to listen to anyone to fullfill their objective (Money and High-rate critics). They are good in that. It's a pity than when the potatos burn, good products appear, and when you have money, platform, and people waiting... you have the big chance to do right, you...

Give them a chance? Had their big chance this time and screwed up worse. They won't care actually, since they make money besides the game is good or bad, and IGN rates it 9.5. So... why would they've listen to Obsidian?

I think we expired long before FO3 and NV... haha.

I aggree, but that's exactly the point. The "upsides" of the game look terribly.... "blackened"? by the writing. But if we put aside all that crap and imagine a good writing and some improvements on... armor, settlements, all the unfinished or unbalanced stuff? Well, it doesn't sound that...

Well... I have to say I read this forums for a lot of years and I aggree on all the critics about FO3 and now FO4. I finished FO4 today and I aggree is the worst game of the franchise. Not even close to NV, much less to the classics. But what I hate from Fallout 4 is nothing about the "skull"...

N+1: Post-nuclear factions' only motivation is the amount of hate/like/need-for-free robots.

Of course it is =/

I have intelligent friends who actually are fans of Black Isle's creations, and also game designers today, with a lot of respect for good and old stuff, who indeed enjoy FO4. The most interesting opinion I had was "I love old Fallout RPGs, I play this game as it is now, a shooter, better in...

I started watching, it is good.... but when talking about ending I had to turn it off because I haven't finished FO4 yet. haha giving it a chance though... I aggree what the video says.