A javascript Q which is really bothering me...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smackrazor
  • Start date Start date
S

Smackrazor

Guest
I'm making a new style readme for all of TMS' mods into *.hta (HTML app) format.

Anyway, enough of the background info... I need to figure out how on earth you get the whole window draggable by clicking inside the body tag? And don't send me to javascript.com Xotor because they don't have this kind of stuff there.

If anyone knows of a script to do this could you inform me of its location?

Danke,

Smackrazor (smackrazor@earthlink.net)
http://www.nma-fallout.com/pipboy2000le
 
Right

It is completely 100% functional, anyone want the code?
 
RE: Right

Upload it somewhere and post the link. I wanna see if it's what I think it is...



http://www.nma-fallout.com/cgi-bin/forum/ForumID5/786.shtml#11

zero-x's bitter words after his encounter with roshambo:

"I agree with you but there comes a fuckin point i dont know who roquirbo thinks he is but I at least you didnt really criticize me and i appreciate that i hate people who fuck with my ideas when i didnt say shit to em and yes he is the kind of guy i would take a scalpel tear his head open the take an hammer use the end to samsh through the medulla and use the nail pull as a pry to pull back the top of the skull revealing a brain (small but brain nontheless)and take desert eagle magnum and blow it through his fucking spine as he still breath and then rip out his heart and show him how black it is before he dies but as you said thats illegal well cya"
 
RE: Right

>Danke but I say screw nutscrape
>users... the only thing that
>was good about nutscrape was
>security but MSIE 6 has
>seen to that.

Oh I say screw them too, but you do need to provide support for that browser at least until the market penetration isn't as much.

Now what's funny is that instead of being forced to use the inferior Netscape browser on Linux, you can now use Opera on Linux, which actually renders CSS correctly! Oh my!

I read that Netscape is making plans to ditch Navigator/Communicator as they aren't earning any money with it and they have definitely lost the browser wars.

Now if only Microsoft would port IE to Linux....

-Xotor-

[div align=center]

http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
[/div]
 
RE: Right

Yeah, it really sucks to see all these Netscape-only computers in libraries and computer labs, knowing just how bad Netscape is compared to latest versions of Internet Explorer... I mean, you know it's better, you know you can do great stuff much easier on IE, but a lot of people still use Netscape.



http://www.nma-fallout.com/cgi-bin/forum/ForumID5/786.shtml#11

zero-x's bitter words after his encounter with roshambo:

"I agree with you but there comes a fuckin point i dont know who roquirbo thinks he is but I at least you didnt really criticize me and i appreciate that i hate people who fuck with my ideas when i didnt say shit to em and yes he is the kind of guy i would take a scalpel tear his head open the take an hammer use the end to samsh through the medulla and use the nail pull as a pry to pull back the top of the skull revealing a brain (small but brain nontheless)and take desert eagle magnum and blow it through his fucking spine as he still breath and then rip out his heart and show him how black it is before he dies but as you said thats illegal well cya"
 
RE: Right

>Now if only Microsoft would port
>IE to Linux....

Not gonna happen. Microsoft are using this as a lever to get people interested in their OS, and I must admit win2K is the best OS I've seen so far. However I was helping my friend install it onto an AMD powered comp and not a single app would run without giving a message saying ti was broken.

Anyone know about that bug?
 
RE: Right

>Yeah, it really sucks to see
>all these Netscape-only computers in
>libraries and computer labs, knowing
>just how bad Netscape is
>compared to latest versions of
>Internet Explorer... I mean, you
>know it's better, you know
>you can do great stuff
>much easier on IE, but
>a lot of people still
>use Netscape.

Some people think they're all "l33t" by not using a "Microsoft" browser because they think it adds to the monopolistic power of Microsoft. The sad thing they don't realize is that Nutscrape didn't lose because of Microsoft's "monopoly" it lost because it SUCKS. What is really pathetic is the fact that Nutscrape 6.0 uses more memory than IE 5.5! At 30 megs of memory, Nutscrape 6.0 uses almost ten megs more than IE 5.5.

The IE/Netscape war was capitalism at its best: Providing the populace with the best browser for the best price, free. Netscape was the loser because it produced an inferior browser.

They're missing out on the best browser ever created. I don't give a damn whether IE was made by Microsoft, or by terrorists, or by child rapists, it's just a great browser, and if they ported it to Linux, I'd use it there too.

The best way to destroy your enemies is to sell something better than them for free. Then you can't be considered to be stifling competition because you're not earning money off it.

-Xotor-

[div align=center]

http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
[/div]
 
RE: Right

>>Now if only Microsoft would port
>>IE to Linux....
>
>Not gonna happen. Microsoft are using
>this as a lever to
>get people interested in their
>OS, and I must admit
>win2K is the best OS
>I've seen so far. However
>I was helping my friend
>install it onto an AMD
>powered comp and not a
>single app would run without
>giving a message saying ti
>was broken.

Didn't happen to me. I installed Win2k on an Athlon 1200mhz at my office and it runs perfectly.

I tried running it on my current AMD K6-III 450mhz and had some problems with my crappy ATI video card.

How much RAM was on your friend's system? 64 megs is a minimum, but even 128 megs is cutting it close. The Athlon system above has 1.5 gig of PC133 RAM (only $117 bucks!) so RAM is not an issue.

-Xotor-

[div align=center]

http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
[/div]
 
RE: Right

>>Yeah, it really sucks to see
>>all these Netscape-only computers in
>>libraries and computer labs, knowing
>>just how bad Netscape is
>>compared to latest versions of
>>Internet Explorer... I mean, you
>>know it's better, you know
>>you can do great stuff
>>much easier on IE, but
>>a lot of people still
>>use Netscape.
>
>Some people think they're all "l33t"
>by not using a "Microsoft"
>browser because they think it
>adds to the monopolistic power
>of Microsoft. The sad
>thing they don't realize is
>that Nutscrape didn't lose because
>of Microsoft's "monopoly" it lost
>because it SUCKS. What
>is really pathetic is the
>fact that Nutscrape 6.0 uses
>more memory than IE 5.5!
> At 30 megs of
>memory, Nutscrape 6.0 uses almost
>ten megs more than IE
>5.5.
>
>The IE/Netscape war was capitalism at
>its best: Providing the
>populace with the best browser
>for the best price, free.
> Netscape was the loser
>because it produced an inferior
>browser.
>
>They're missing out on the best
>browser ever created. I
>don't give a damn whether
>IE was made by Microsoft,
>or by terrorists, or by
>child rapists, it's just a
>great browser, and if they
>ported it to Linux, I'd
>use it there too.
>
>The best way to destroy your
>enemies is to sell something
>better than them for free.
> Then you can't be
>considered to be stifling competition
>because you're not earning money
>off it.
>
>-Xotor-
>
>[div align=center]

>http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
>[/div]


Actually there was only one better thing with NN4 compared to MSIE4 and that was the security involved and the fact that there are much fewer exploits compared with MSIE. However this is also probably because NN4 released their browser before w3c produced a document on HTML version 4 standards.

MSIE 5/6 (and outlook, outlook express) also still have a lot of security bugs currently, one of the most deadly was with Outlook\outlook express where an email message could download and run a program without any user input at all.

For more info go to www.guninski.com
 
RE: Right

>>>Now if only Microsoft would port
>>>IE to Linux....
>>
>>Not gonna happen. Microsoft are using
>>this as a lever to
>>get people interested in their
>>OS, and I must admit
>>win2K is the best OS
>>I've seen so far. However
>>I was helping my friend
>>install it onto an AMD
>>powered comp and not a
>>single app would run without
>>giving a message saying ti
>>was broken.
>
>Didn't happen to me. I
>installed Win2k on an Athlon
>1200mhz at my office and
>it runs perfectly.
>
>I tried running it on my
>current AMD K6-III 450mhz and
>had some problems with my
>crappy ATI video card.
>
>How much RAM was on your
>friend's system? 64 megs
>is a minimum, but even
>128 megs is cutting it
>close. The Athlon system
>above has 1.5 gig of
>PC133 RAM (only $117 bucks!)
>so RAM is not an
>issue.

He has 300 and something MB of ram and an 800 mHz processor. His video card shouldn't be giving him trouble because it's a hercules prophet geforce 2 ultra.

My system is Athlon 1gHz with 128mb DDR SDRAM PC200 with a visiontek Geforce 2 GTS. I think it should be fine for me.
 
RE: Right

>Actually there was only one better
>thing with NN4 compared to
>MSIE4 and that was the
>security involved and the fact
>that there are much fewer
>exploits compared with MSIE. However
>this is also probably because
>NN4 released their browser before
>w3c produced a document on
>HTML version 4 standards.

Well they should've updated the browser (the 4.x browser, not the bloated 6.x version).

>MSIE 5/6 (and outlook, outlook express)
>also still have a lot
>of security bugs currently, one
>of the most deadly was
>with Outlook\outlook express where an
>email message could download and
>run a program without any
>user input at all.

Doesn't bother me. Then again, I don't use Outlook...

-Xotor-

[div align=center]

http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
[/div]
 
RE: Right

>My system is Athlon 1gHz with
>128mb DDR SDRAM PC200 with
>a visiontek Geforce 2 GTS.
>I think it should be
>fine for me.

Ouch, you got the PC1600 RAM, and only 128 megs of it? You should get more. You're doing your system a disservice by not. You can get 512 megs of PC1600 for only $70.

-Xotor-

[div align=center]

http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
[/div]
 
RE: Right

>>My system is Athlon 1gHz with
>>128mb DDR SDRAM PC200 with
>>a visiontek Geforce 2 GTS.
>>I think it should be
>>fine for me.
>
>Ouch, you got the PC1600 RAM,
>and only 128 megs of
>it? You should get
>more. You're doing your
>system a disservice by not.
> You can get 512
>megs of PC1600 for only
>$70.

I'd like to know where...

Plus are there any really good GeForce 3s out currently? So far I've seen only visiontek and leadtek

>-Xotor-
>
>[div align=center]

>http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
>[/div]
 
Yet another Question to do with HTML Help

I would like to know if it is at all possible to close the window automatically with a CHM file or just move it off the screen? I've tried several techniques and it didn't work as I wanted it to
 
RE: Right

>>Actually there was only one better
>>thing with NN4 compared to
>>MSIE4 and that was the
>>security involved and the fact
>>that there are much fewer
>>exploits compared with MSIE. However
>>this is also probably because
>>NN4 released their browser before
>>w3c produced a document on
>>HTML version 4 standards.
>
>Well they should've updated the browser
>(the 4.x browser, not the
>bloated 6.x version).
>
>>MSIE 5/6 (and outlook, outlook express)
>>also still have a lot
>>of security bugs currently, one
>>of the most deadly was
>>with Outlook\outlook express where an
>>email message could download and
>>run a program without any
>>user input at all.
>
>Doesn't bother me. Then again,
>I don't use Outlook...
>
>-Xotor-
>
>[div align=center]

>http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
>[/div]

But I could still do exactly the same with MSIE... but I think you have to have active scripting enabled or something...
 
RE: Right

>>Ouch, you got the PC1600 RAM,
>>and only 128 megs of
>>it? You should get
>>more. You're doing your
>>system a disservice by not.
>> You can get 512
>>megs of PC1600 for only
>>$70.
>
>I'd like to know where...

www.pricewatch.com

>Plus are there any really good
>GeForce 3s out currently? So
>far I've seen only visiontek
>and leadtek

VisionTek is just fine and they benchmark the same or better than many of the name-brand cards. You just don't get stuff like extra software with it (big deal), which is what makes the other cards more expensive. They still retain the TV-out and other standard features though.

Hercules is a very good brand, but sells their cards at very high prices (I've seen it as high as $600 for Geforce3).

Asus's Geforce3 card, the 7700 as I believe it is called, is out.

-Xotor-

[div align=center]

http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
[/div]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top