John Uskglass
Venerable Relic of the Wastes

Oh Shit. Are you a Radiohead fan?paranoid android
Oh Shit. Are you a Radiohead fan?paranoid android
John Uskglass said:That is kind of weird. I could really see you getting into their post-Bends stuff. Especially some of the crazier stuff on Kid A.
And it's probably the most pretentious band in the world. That can't be anything but a plus for you.
John Uskglass said:Hope you recognize my sig....
John Uskglass said:You really might like some of thier stuff though. If you liked The Bends I am willing to bet you would like Hail to the Thief, though I have no idea what you would think of Kid A or Amnesiac. Idoteque and The National Anthem are both great songs, might want to check them out at least.
John Uskglass said:Russian music? Ugh. After Prokofiev, no thanks. I won't even jerk off to Tatu.
John Uskglass said:What kind of 70's and 80's? Clash, Joy Division, The Pogues, etc?
Damn right. My favorite song. Also have the brilliant piano cover by Christopher O'Riley.Let Down?
Well, that works out, as Hail to the Thief is probably more like OK Computer. I just said The Bends as a lot of people have very strong (negative and positive) feelings about OK Computer.I didn't like the Bends as much as I did OK Computer.
Who then? I could kind of see you listening to The Velvet Underground.No, not at all. More 60's and 70's, come to think of it, the 80's were pretty bad.
Fair enough.Also, Shostakovich was after Prokofiev. Ass.
John Uskglass said:Well, that works out, as Hail to the Thief is probably more like OK Computer. I just said The Bends as a lot of people have very strong (negative and positive) feelings about the album.
John Uskglass said:Who then? I could kind of see you listening to The Velvet Underground.
John Uskglass said:Fair enough.
I actually meant OK Computer. A lot of people love it, a lot of people hate it and view it as the CD with which Radiohead went crazy.Really? I was not aware.
Bolded the ones I really liked, italicized the ones I like. Bob Dyland gets italicized only because I don't have that much of his.What do I listen to, though? Lemme go over a part of my CD collection, which contains what I play more often than other stuff (because to get into that...); Neil Young and Crazy Horse, Frank Zappa, CSNY, U2, the Who, the Doobie Brothers, the Rolling Stones, Simon & Garfunkel, Rush, Santana, Queen, Bob Dylan, Dream Theater, Eric Clapton, the Doors.
Those that I have of the above (and I have at least 1 CD of most of the above on my iPod) I like. But to be honest, I'm really getting into the Minimalists and Postminimalists right now. John Adams uber alles.That's just containing mostly 70's/80's, which ignores classical (Khatschaturian, Saint-Saëns, Andreiewitsch, Wolf-Ferarri, Beethoven, Vivaldi, Dukas, Grieg, Borodin, Händel, Liszt, Bartók, Mahler, Bach, Mussorgsky, Glinka, Puccini, Bernstein, Prokofiev, Haydn, Rachmaninov, Rimsky-Korsakov, Rubinstein, Paganini, Sibelius, Tschaikowsky, Verdi, Debussy, Wagner, Mendelssohn-Bartholdy, Brahms, Dvorcak, to name a few),
I have no idea whatsoever as to who he is. Just did want to look stupid. Which is what I look like in this post.I can hardly imagine anyone listening to him. I only do occasionally.
John Uskglass said:Bolded the ones I really liked, italicized the ones I like. Bob Dyland gets italicized only because I don't have that much of his.
John Uskglass said:Weird. Would have thought of you as a lot more of a Sonic Youth, VU, maybe some Krautrock kind of a guy. Always saw you as somehow experimental, and even if that list is good (which it is), it's kind of safe and as far as you can get from alternative.
John Uskglass said:Those that I have of the above (and I have at least 1 CD of most of the above on my iPod) I like. But to be honest, I'm really getting into the Minimalists and Postminimalists right now. John Adams uber alles.
John Uskglass said:I have no idea whatsoever as to who he is. Just did want to look stupid. Which is what I look like in this post.
Kharn said:I can't imagine you listening to Shostakovich, though
I can hardly imagine anyone listening to him. I only do occasionally.
Luke said:Why would you do that? To better appreciate all the actually appealing music out there? Don't get me wrong, duder was brilliant, though mainly in trolling the world to bare dissonances and harmonical/rhythmical rape beyond the point of when it's arousing.
Aight. Alas, I haven't come across any of his first six symphonies that you previously recommended though. What I can recall that I have heard is basically symphony no. 7, a bundle of piano music and a heap of string quartets - so I wouldn't really know. Also, that which is completely into the atonical dissonance thang, I don't know if it deserves to be called 'music' anymore. Just me though.Kharn said:No. He's not completely into the atonical dissonance thing, y'know, he's a moderate.
But even so, occasionally, I do like to listen to him, either a complete composition or a fragment. I don't listen to it awful because it is indeed not the easiest music to listen to, but that doesn't mean it's occasionally enjoyable. Just not very often.
Yet, I wouldn't say, that human evolution has ended. Too many things are still here, and the Ey hasn't been conceived, as of yet.The_Vault_Dweller said:Good Lord their getting along! 'Tis the end of the world! Repent for your sins and donate to NMA! Name Dragonetti artist of the year and as Ratty succeeds in his world domination plan! Game Over Man!