Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'General Discussion Forum' started by PsychoSniper, Sep 10, 2004.
I like the aesthetics of the beard and clothing.
I like it, but the lack of color (with the unusual style & subject) will make it very hard for some people to see what it is.
what is the deal with that?
What's your Sherman from?
*Reminds me of Metal Slug—but it isn't/10
Holy Shit that one is great. 10/10.
Robocop looking man, clad in full metal 9/10
A backwards 01
/edit: Yeah, I'll just fix all of your posts until now and if you don't stop it you'll get nice touch with the banhammer.
If the intention is somewhere between scary and sinister.. then it's a 10/10
Lookin' good. Nice beard. 8/10.
generic loli 4/10
Generic history guy/10
Generic black&white avatar.
Though I'll be honest, is he supposed to be someone known person?
It's Randall from the 1994 ultra low budget cult classic Clerks. He's also the reason we're not getting a clerks III.
Which is great, because Clerks 2 was shit.
dunno who that is
False. So much false.
I/10 for being false.
Clerks 2 was a complete and utter antithesis of everything Clerks represented. I have no idea what Kevin Smith thought when he made that one. It's probably his worst film that I've seen.
Were it a standalone film that follows some other characters in those situations, it would be fine, I guess. As a sequel, it is a disgrace. It literally has one good scene, which is like 5 minutes before the end credits.
Avatar gets a 10/10
it would be 0/10 if it's Graves from C2.
You get -10/10 tho.
A sequel for one.
Is that the Trumpster?
If so, then 9/10.