RE: Here's a pic of the vote: >[font size=1" color="#FF0000]LAST EDITED ON Nov-13-00 >AT 09:05 AM (GMT) > >http://a388.g.akamai.net/f/388/21/1.../11/09/election.president/large.ballot.ap.jpg > >Now...anyone who could NOT understand this >should either be shot dead >on general principles, or declared >mentally incompetent. Actually, that ballot is the most un-selfexplainable voting mechanism I've ever seen. In Norway we just have colored slips of paper, ONE - and get this - ONE slip of paper per political party. We just select a slip and done with it. And it's not harder to auto-count, well maybe a little harder but i think it's easier than your system anyway >And for a write-in candidate, I >would have put Alfred E. >Neuman, because he's the one >with most sense! > >"What, me worry?" I just noticed something! Is this joke really old, seems too obvious that nobody noticed it before: didn't the Worker's World candidate have a "sexual relationship" with one well-known Democrat some time back?