Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'General Discussion Forum' started by Dr. Jerkoholic, Jan 28, 2006.
counting bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drums
GO BACK TO SLEEP
I knew there was something fishy, but damn... That's a little too much for me all at one time. It's kind of creepy that I randomly ran into this thing after some n00b revives this dead thread. I think destiny has something big planned for me...
Take the red pill.
Wow... Just... Fucking wow. There is no truth in this world :'-(
Why can't I see that goddamn movie?
You must equip the ring...
Try downloading google player, otherwise, sucks to be you. Maybe your internet sucks? The movie is well worth the hour and a half it takes to watch it.
Because Google hates you.
Anyway, cool, they have Hunter S. Thompson in it.
Meh, I'm very sceptical as to this video, convincing as it is. It's really easy to make a lot of things seem plausible, see Bowling for Columbine, but I really lack a decent, unbiased and multi-sided evaluation of the facts, not another one-sided attempt to prove something.
Either way, it was definitely an interesting video. I like the bits in the beginning about Cuba.
I can't back the government up on this one...I mean, they want it wrapped up in a nice package, but to do that they need to ignore a lot of info.
I do find it highly improbable that all buildings involved would freefall.
There are too many questions unanswered to believe this administration...on top of that, they are the most secretive admin ever.
found this today thought i'd post it here
I don't know if I am correct, someone please correct me if I am wrong.
But from what I am reading, there was something like 160+ billion dollars in gold, being secured in vaults underneath the WTC's.
and after the 9/11 incident, only 200 million of which, was recovered?
Is this completely wrong?
Or is this fact?
Don't forget they had unicorns in that vault as well.
Which they deny, needless to say.
(have to copy and paste the entire URL. edit, no you don't - Kharn)
There were small gold storage facilities owned by commercial banks, under the WTC's, this I have come to find is true.
I believe the claims that 160 billion dollars worth of gold, is outlandish, and that if there were 160 billion dollars worth of gold, and only 200 million were recovered, it was would of been front-page news story for months on end.
So obviously what I read must be entirely bullshit.
What confuses me is, why did the makers of the 9/11 Loose Change video, put that tidbit in there?
What was their source?
The more I look up the claims that the 9/11 Loose Change video makes, the more I find big fat loopholes.
Seems to me to be an hour and 20 minutes of garbage. With hypnotic music and garbled pseudo-fact after pseudo-fact, thrown in the viewers face, in a desperate effort to get him/her to believe.
Thanks for fixing my URL Kharn.
Well the number of approximately 200 million is true, thats about the extent of what has been recovered, but it is not just in gold. It is in all forms of precious metals.
Still haven't found any basis for the claim that some conspiracy theorist are claiming, that there were in excess of 160 billlion+ being stored down there.
1) if i had a building that was publicly accessable that housed many secrets and a lot of proof of possible illegal activities, i would make sure that if there was ever a hint of a problem of discovery, i would make sure that the building didnt last long enough for investigation/discovery.
2) if i had lots of documented evidince that as of 2015 - 2020 the oil of the world would be running low to the point where demand would out-strip production, i would make damn sure i was the one who controlled the major oil fields before that point happened.
3) if i was planning on starting a war to control world-wide resources, i would " test the water " by starting a smaller war to divert attention by providing a misleading start to the smaller one.
4) if i wanted to start a war over resources to gain control before they were critical, i would attempt to divert attention by either allowing or creating a circumstance to divert attention from the true intention.
or am i just too cold-heartedly logical like that?
On a related note,
The New Department of Homeland Sodomy
Par for the course, one might say.
One of the funniest debates in NMA.
I'm going to miss the Doc. hehehe That's what happens to you when you start to see the faces in the wall of your bedroom during the night. err... That never happened to me.
A Perfect Circle.