POLL: Trump or Hillary

Discussion in 'General Discussion Forum' started by Fall Out Boy, Sep 29, 2016.

TRUMP OR HILLARY FOR US PRESIDENT 2016?

Poll closed Nov 7, 2016.
  1. Donald Trump

    30 vote(s)
    34.5%
  2. Hillary Clinton

    10 vote(s)
    11.5%
  3. Just shoot me already

    47 vote(s)
    54.0%
  1. Erich van Loon

    Erich van Loon Where'd That 6th Toe Come From?

    404
    May 23, 2016
    Exactly.
     
  2. Throatpunch

    Throatpunch Banned

    Apr 14, 2016
    Forget everyone else the star of the show was Ken Bone.
     
  3. Vergil

    Vergil Banned

    Jul 8, 2014
     
    • [Like] [Like] x 1
  4. CaptJ

    CaptJ The Rival of Roquefort Hall

    587
    Jan 19, 2016
    I think that people would go "If the people who voted the third party voted Y instead, then X wouldn't have become our president!".
     
    • [Like] [Like] x 2
  5. Jogre

    Jogre So Old I'm Losing Radiation Signs

    Oct 25, 2015
    Honestly, the world would be much better if people actually voted for who they wanted to win, rather than voting for candidates they dislike out of fear of losing the election.
     
  6. FalloutIsMyDrug

    FalloutIsMyDrug Former Fo3 Lover(converted)

    236
    Sep 29, 2016
    Or if they voted on who they wanted instead of whether they are red or blue.
     
    • [Like] [Like] x 1
  7. Crni Vuk

    Crni Vuk M4A3 Oldfag oTO Orderite

    Nov 25, 2008
    Seriously, what is it with this ... incredible focus on sex and sex scandals in the US? I have sometimes the feeling you can kill a hooker and snort cokain, and get away with it, depending on what ever if you actually had sex with her.
    And that from a nation with the largest porn industry this planet has ever seen since the first human walked this earth.
     
  8. FalloutIsMyDrug

    FalloutIsMyDrug Former Fo3 Lover(converted)

    236
    Sep 29, 2016
    Have you never played GTA? That's the American dream, buddy.
     
  9. CaptJ

    CaptJ The Rival of Roquefort Hall

    587
    Jan 19, 2016
    I heard ranked voting prevents the candidates from being too polarized because one might not be someone's first choice but they could still be someone's second choice.
     
  10. SuAside

    SuAside Testament to the ghoul lifespan
    Admin

    May 27, 2004
    Gary burned his bridges with the libertarians... So even he is no longer an option.
     
  11. CaptJ

    CaptJ The Rival of Roquefort Hall

    587
    Jan 19, 2016
    Do you mean by thinking that people need a license to operate a metal box that moves 100 mps or by being ignorant of the problem in the Middle East?
     
  12. SuAside

    SuAside Testament to the ghoul lifespan
    Admin

    May 27, 2004
    By partnering up with a guy who is anti-second amendment and by saying stupid shit in recent interviews. Gary is now mainstream while his niche used to be the fringe. The only reason why he might get more votes than before is simply because the only two mainstream candidates are fucking insane.

    As for Aleppo, even if you're an isolationist presidential candidate, doesn't mean you don't need to follow current affairs...
     
    • [Like] [Like] x 1
  13. Baccius

    Baccius First time out of the vault

    18
    Sep 28, 2016
    At Least Trump Won't Try to Hide it When Fucking the World like Criminal Clinton, that is as good as it can get for the rest of the world
     
  14. Dr Fallout

    Dr Fallout Centurion

    Aug 17, 2015
    That's a really low standard of good.
     
  15. Vergil

    Vergil Banned

    Jul 8, 2014
    Why is there no Jeb! option?

    Slow and Steady win the race.
     
    • [Like] [Like] x 1
  16. Jogre

    Jogre So Old I'm Losing Radiation Signs

    Oct 25, 2015
    The best course of action for America in this election would be a third party candidate, and there is no better third party candidate than this guy:
    [/Spoiler]
     
  17. SuAside

    SuAside Testament to the ghoul lifespan
    Admin

    May 27, 2004
    It's funny how Trump's actions of decades ago take the spot light, while the email leaks of Hillary & Podesta mention "wet work" (explicitly in the context of assassination since the writer comments he's "not talking about a pool party either", and not in the context of state business or legitimate goverment backed covert ops), how person X needs to get a good job within the party or in government because X "knows where the bodies are burried" (granted, that one might have been figurative), shows how supporting Hillary allows you to buy cushy government positions, comments about the successfull manipulation of the supreme court (and "putting supreme court judges in their place so they don't get any ideas"), confirmation that Hillary had non-private mails deleted from her server and lied about it, shows clandestine support to ISIS in Qatar and Saudi Arabia, shows that gun smuggling might be involved in the Benghazi fiasco, shows that Hillary blatantly lied to congress multiple times, shows that the DNC wilfully sabotaged Bernie Sanders to give Hillary the edge and shows how much Hillary is in the pocket of George Soros and foreign donors.
    And Wikileaks is claiming it's leaking mails in a way which "ramp up" in sensitivity... Who knows what's more to come.

    But let's keep talking about who may or may not have inappropriately touched someone decades ago... (sure, we shouldn't trivialize this, but HRC should be up for fucking treason instead of running for president)
     
    • [Like] [Like] x 3
  18. Crni Vuk

    Crni Vuk M4A3 Oldfag oTO Orderite

    Nov 25, 2008
    Well Sua, in the United States you can snort cokain with a hooker, that's all nice and dandy, but you can't have also sex with her.
     
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2016
  19. whirlingdervish

    whirlingdervish Brahmin Cavalry Commander

    Jul 3, 2007
    Apparently in that crazy old USA, people value proveable assertions (like Trump not showing any respect for women) over those that are unproven or straight up whackjob conspiracy theories that people should be ashamed for believing.

    If ol "crooked/insert epithet here if you have a childmind" Hillary is really so capable of getting away with things like murder, and she has such vast control and power over people, that 20 years of close scrutiny and millions of dollars of taxpayer money in years of increasingly deep investigations can't find or prove these things, then I think I'd probably call her a strong and capable leader who we should be clamoring to elect.

    Yet somehow, nobody mentions this current scary power and capability that Hillary must have in this context, and instead they talk about how her husband (who is not running for office) diddled an intern consentualy back when most of the current voters were children, and when that intern has been quoted as totally wanting that diddling to further her own career. They try to sell us stories of her being weak and on deaths door, and having some different medical troubles every week.

    Which one is it?

    Is she uber powerful and capable of doing anything she wants with impunity and controlling the USA as a dictator forever, or is she a weak old woman with moments to live who has to be carried around by handlers, and who enabled her husband for "reasons"?
     
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2016
  20. Crni Vuk

    Crni Vuk M4A3 Oldfag oTO Orderite

    Nov 25, 2008
    All this "what's in her e-mails!" talk doesn't bother me even for a second. As long there is no real true proof, it's all nothing but accusations. But that's not the real issue in my opinion anyway. What really disturbs me about Hillary is her conection in politics, the she's the extension of the military-industrial complex, a lap dog of Wall-Street and pretty much any big Lobby you can imagine. Hillary is pretty much the embodiment of stagnation and what's wrong with current politics.
    You can say about Bernie what you want, but he was much more of a honest politican than Hillary with less skeletons hidden in his closet.