Seems like you're in denial there bub. It's ok to admit that Witcher 3 obviously has better animation work. Look at this game from 2007; even its animation is better than FO3/NV/FO4 combined. Look - I'm one of those gamers that really don't care about graphics sometimes, as long as the gameplay/story is good. I still play games from a decade ago that graphicphiles today would say look like "ass." Witcher 1, for instance, I find to be an amazing classic RPG from 2008, which obviously doesn't have super-AAA graphics. FO4 looks average at best, but certainly a little better than FO3 and obviously still has holdover issues with the ancient Gamebryo underlayer - honest perspective. Now even if FO4 looks average, I would probably say the rest of it would be fine if it has a story full of meaningful choice/consequences with a sensical story/setting. If it doesn't have the gameplay/story I desire out of an RPG then it is a pass for me. Several concerns that have already been gone over, however, have led me to decide that buying this at release, for full price, would be a waste of my money.