Recently, at least in the Future Fallout Games board, we've had a lot of arguments that revolve around the general consensus of Bethesda, Fallout 3, and Fallout 4 on No Mutants Allowed. To help prevent the derailment of threads I'm offering this thread as a place to discuss it, assuming this hasn't already been done. If a staff member would like to move these posts onto this thread, I'm open to it. I'll probably put links to the threads that include these posts. http://www.nma-fallout.com/showthread.php?203398-Skills-in-Fallout-4-What-We-Know/page3 http://www.nma-fallout.com/showthread.php?203363-Bethesda-s-Fallout-4-Continuity-Breaker/page3 My personal opinion goes as following: I like everything about Fallout: New Vegas. I do feel that if there wasn't a Fallout 3, Fallout: New Vegas wouldn't be exactly how it was, for better or worse. Since I started playing Fallout with New Vegas, I am personally glad of how it turned out. For that, I thank Bethesda and more so Obsidian. That said, I don't hate any of the Fallouts including 3. Fallout 2 is my second favorite in the franchise, 3 being the third. I couldn't get into Fallout 1 personally. I think No Mutants Allowed is known for holding Fallout 3 to a lower opinion than the rest of the Internet. It has attracted trolls and people simply looking for a debate. I'm hoping this thread will allow people to get what they want to say out without derailing other threads.