Huh? Fallout 2 is still criticized for its incomplete release and logical/setting inconsistencies here. Fallout 3 just superseded it, it didn't replace it. If you lurk a lot, you'll have seen discussions on New Reno and talking deathclaws come up frequently. Nor does your argument work, because New Vegas is considered better than 3. By your logic, we should be panning New Vegas and fondly remembering 3. This is a wild theory, I know, but maybe we're just critical people, of any game offered? Also, not sure what you mean by "again". Clarify lest I have to ban you for circumventing a ban.